🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be used for developing AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.